How AI is used — ITISYOU

Where AI was involved

AI assisted with research, design exploration, writing code, structuring content and drafting text — including text on this site. That is a material contribution, not a spellcheck, and describing every page as hand-written would be misleading.

What that means in practice:

Code. Much of the implementation across the network was written with AI assistance, then reviewed, tested and changed.
Content. Pages here were drafted with AI help from project records, live product evidence and the founder’s own notes, then edited.
Research. AI helped gather and summarise material, including the third-party brand rules that decide whether a logo appears on this site.

What AI did not do

It did not decide what is true. Every factual claim on this site traces to a source that was checked — a live product, a public repository, a published brand policy, a project record. Where a source could not be found, the claim was removed rather than filled in.

It did not invent evidence. No user numbers, revenue figures, testimonials, awards, partnerships or certifications appear here, because none exist. A model will happily produce all of those on request, which is precisely why they are absent.

It did not set the status of anything. Product statuses come from opening each product and reading what it says about itself. Where an earlier description disagreed with the live product, the product won — the corrections are listed.

Inside the products

The strongest statement about AI in this network is a restriction. DEV.ITISYOU publishes, as a rule, that AI does not get to decide that a fix works. AI can help structure a playbook; the evidence has to come from a human reproducing something on a stated version. Removing that rule would remove the point of the product.

ATSYou takes the same position from the other direction. It uses AI to help tailor a CV, and then refuses to deliver a document containing any sentence that cannot be traced back to a claim the user confirmed. The model’s fluency is treated as a hazard to be contained, not as evidence.

What this does not claim

AI assistance does not make anything here more reliable, and this page is not a quality guarantee in either direction. A human reviewed this material; humans get things wrong too. If you find an error, the corrections process is how it gets fixed, and “an AI wrote it” will not appear as an excuse.

Generated imagery

There are no AI-generated photographs of people on this site. The founder page uses typography rather than a portrait, because a generated face representing a real person is exactly the kind of small dishonesty the rest of this site argues against.