Check
Claim checker
Paste what you are about to publish. This points at the sentences a reader could hold you to but could not check — and says what to write instead.
Checked in this tab. Nothing is uploaded, stored or sent anywhere.
What this is for
Most copy that gets a site into trouble is not dishonest. It is enthusiastic. Somebody writes that a thing is secure, or fast, or trusted, because it feels true — and then a reader, a regulator or a review process asks what is behind the sentence, and there is nothing.
This checker looks for one specific failure: a sentence that asserts something a reader could act on, without anything they could check it against. It reads your text in your browser and reports what it matched, why that matters, and a concrete alternative.
What it looks for
- Absolutes. Superlatives, guarantees and priority claims, which one counter-example makes false.
- Popularity with no number. Quantities of users, awards and rankings that imply an external judgement with a name and a date.
- Implied availability. Language that says something can be obtained now. This is the claim readers act on first, so it is the one that wastes their time when it is wrong.
- Compliance and certification. Statuses that are assessed against a regime, sometimes by an auditor — the costliest kind to assert without holding.
- Security promises. Protection claims that the first thing getting through will falsify.
- Unmeasured performance. Speed and scale with no measurement, method or conditions.
What it does not do
The limits are the point, so they are here rather than discovered later.
- It cannot tell whether a claim is true. It only notices that a sentence asserts something. A guarantee you genuinely honour is still flagged, because the checker cannot see your refund process — the flag is a prompt to show the evidence, not a verdict.
- It matches phrasing, not meaning. A claim written in an unusual way will pass, and an innocent sentence occasionally will not. It is deliberately conservative: a false positive costs you one dismissal, while a false negative is how a site starts overclaiming.
- It is not a legal review. Nothing here tells you whether a statement complies with advertising or consumer law.
- It is English-only, and tuned for product and marketing copy rather than prose generally.
Why this site has one
Because the same idea runs over this site before anything is published. Every product record here is gated on a list of phrases that cannot be used without a record behind them, which is a large part of why the status page says three of the ten products are unfinished rather than describing plans in the present tense. This is that idea, generalised, for anyone else publishing something.
If you are working through the pages a site owes its readers rather than the words on them, the trust page checklist is the other half.
Your text stays here
The analysis is a few hundred lines of JavaScript running in your own browser. Nothing is uploaded, nothing is stored, and closing the tab is all it takes to get rid of it. This site runs no analytics and sets no cookies of its own; the advertising on it does set cookies, but it cannot see the contents of this box — see privacy and cookies.
Found something it should catch, or something it flags wrongly? Send it to kpleelaaravind@gmail.com. Both are useful, and the second more so.